Butalbital APAP Information Digest
Butalbital/APAP/Caffeine is a barbiturate sedative mixed with a non-aspirin pain medication (acetaminophen) and caffeine. This non-narcotic pain medication and relaxant is often prescribed for tension headaches caused by contractions of the muscles in the neck and shoulder area, and migraine.
A comparison of the potencies of a series of barbiturates at the neuromuscular junction and on the central nervous system.
The ability of a series of barbiturates to depress the depolarizing action of carbachol at the end-plate of guinea-pig lumbrical muscle was studied. The compounds studied were: amorbarbital, aprobarbital, barbital, barbituric acid, butabarbital, butalbital, dimethylbutylethyl barbituric acid, hexobarbital, mephobarbitak, secobarbital, thiamylal, and thiopental. The depressant activity was sensitive to small changes in structure of the compounds strongly suggesting that a specific receptor site was involved in the interaction of the drug with the tissue. The observed relative potencies on the motor end-plate were compared with their anesthetic potencies assayed on tadpoles. The two potencies went hand-in-hand for all the compounds studied, including the convulsant member of the series.
Quantitative analysis of a multicomponent analgesic product containing butalbital, using high speed reverse-phase liquid chromatography.
Simultaneous determination by gas chromatography of butalbital,caffeine, amidopyrine and 2 metabolites of the latter in plasma and urine
Investigations of hydrolytic products of butalbital
Severe Optalidon poisoning in a child. Clinical picture, therapy and excretory course of effective components (amidopyrine, butalbital and caffeine
Eletriptan treatment of migraine in patients switching from barbiturate-containing analgesics: results from a multiple-attack study.
The aim of this study was to examine efficacy and tolerability of eletriptan in patients switched from barbiturate-containing combinations (Fiorinal), Fioricet. Migraineurs (n = 160) meeting IHS criteria, with unsatisfactory response in the past year to butalbital-containing combinations, treated up to 16 attacks over 3 months with eletriptan 40 mg. Assessments included headache response and pain-free rates and functional impairment at baseline and 2 h postdose, and global ratings of treatment satisfaction at 24 h. At 2 h postdose, average headache response and pain-free rates were 71% (95% CI, 69-74%) and 37% (95% CI, 35-40%), respectively; 68.5% of patients (95% CI, 65-72%) reported functional response. Within-patient analysis found no efficacy diminution over time (no tolerance). Average headache recurrence rate was 20% (95% CI, 18-23%). Eletriptan was well-tolerated; 6 (3.7%) patients discontinued due to adverse events. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that in poor responders to butalbital-caffeine combinations, switching to eletriptan 40 mg was well-tolerated and efficacious.
Barbiturate withdrawal following Internet purchase of Fioricet.
BACKGROUND: The Internet enables businesses to advertise their pharmaceutical products and services without medical supervision. The Internet also allows for the unsupervised purchase of medications that may have neurologic consequences. OBJECTIVE: To describe acute withdrawal delirium following the abrupt discontinuation of Fioricet. PATIENT: The patient was a 37-year-old woman with a history of depression and migraine headaches but not drug abuse. She developed a florid withdrawal delirium following the discontinuation of a drug she purchased online. The medication, which contained butalbital, was self-administered in escalating doses for the treatment of chronic headaches. Daily doses of up to 750 mg to 1000 mg were reported. RESULTS: The patient was admitted to the hospital for the treatment of unexplained seizures that were followed by several days of an intense withdrawal syndrome. Little improvement was noted after the administration of benzodiazepines and phenothiazine. After parenteral phenobarbital administration, her symptoms resolved. CONCLUSIONS: The withdrawal state from barbiturates is similar to that from ethanol. Tolerance can develop with prolonged abuse, leading to escalating drug doses to achieve the desired effect. The suggested management of both types of withdrawal syndromes is similar, but the relative resistance of the behavioral and autonomic features in patients was remarkable. Physicians should be aware of the ease with which medications can be purchased without supervision from Internet pharmacies. The magnitude of the number of drugs that are made available through this means creates a proclivity to withdrawal states.
Symptomatic treatment of chronically recurring tension headache: a placebo-controlled, multicenter investigation of Fioricet and acetaminophen with codeine.
A double-blind, randomized, multicenter investigation was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of Fioricet, acetaminophen with codeine, and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of tension headache. At the onset of a typical headache, the patients took two capsules of their assigned study medication and rated responses over the next four hours in three target symptoms areas: pain, emotional or psychic tension, and muscle contractions or stiffness in the head and neck. Physicians made global assessments of the same symptom responses and of adverse reactions for each patient. One hundred ninety-eight patients were evaluated. Both active analgesic preparations were more effective than placebo in relieving pain and muscle stiffness or contractions. Fioricet, but not acetaminophen with codeine, was significantly better than placebo in alleviating emotional or psychic tension; Fioricet was also significantly better than acetaminophen with codeine in relieving this symptom. Certain analyses suggested the possibility that Fioricet had a faster and more sustained analgesic effect than acetaminophen with codeine. By the end of the four-hour trial, significantly more patients achieved complete pain relief with Fioricet than with acetaminophen with codeine. The quality and quantity of adverse reactions did not differ significantly among the treatment groups. None was serious, and all abated without medical intervention.
Renal infarction during the use of rizatriptan and zolmitriptan: two case reports.
Rizatriptan and zolmitriptan are both used to relieve acute migraine and cluster headaches. The mechanism of action is similar to the other triptans, in that they reverse abnormal cerebral vasodilation through their activity as 5-HT1B receptor agonists. Triptan-induced vasoconstriction is attributed to its activity on peripheral 5-HT1B receptors and has rarely been reported to result in stroke, myocardial infarction and ischemic colitis. We present two cases of renal infarction associated with therapeutic triptan use. The first patient is a 57-year-old man with a history of hypertension that was well controlled on valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide. He was recently diagnosed with cluster headaches and was treated with indomethacin, prednisone, butalbital-acetaminophen-caffeine and hydrocodone without relief. He then received two therapeutic doses of rizatriptan on each of the two days prior to presentation. Subsequently, he presented to the emergency department complaining of nausea, vomiting and right-sided abdominal pain. A computerized tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast revealed a very large wedge shaped infarction of the right kidney. The second patient is a 34-year-old man with a past medical history significant only for life-long migraine headaches successfully treated for the past six years with zolmitriptan. Shortly after taking one therapeutic dose of zolmitriptan, he presented to the emergency department complaining of nausea and left-sided abdominal pain. A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast revealed multiple wedge-shaped infarctions of the left kidney. Renal infarction was confirmed in both patients by arteriogram of the renal arteries. Although both rizatriptan and zolmitriptan are effective in the treatment of migraine and cluster headaches, they may induce peripheral vasospasm leading to renal infarction.
Glomerular tip lesion associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced nephrotic syndrome.
Glomerular tip lesion and its relation to different glomerular diseases is a subject of controversy. The therapeutic and prognostic clinical implications of glomerular tip lesions are ambiguous. We present a case of glomerular tip lesion associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced nephrotic syndrome that further complicates this issue. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of glomerular tip lesion associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced nephrotic syndrome.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=Pager&DB=pubmed
Butalbital 1
Butalbital 2
Butalbital 3
Butalbital 4
Butalbital 5
Butalbital 6
Butalbital 7
Butalbital 8
Butalbital 9
Butalbital 10
Butalbital 11
Butalbital 12
Butalbital 13
Butalbital 14
Butalbital15